To syphon or not

Joined
7 May 2007
Posts
2,603
Reaction score
127
Location
Dbn,Kzn
when doing water changes , how effective is syphoning the gravel ???? r there pros and cons to this
 

Kanga

Retired Moderator
Joined
7 May 2007
Posts
4,576
Reaction score
23
Location
In the Koeberg blast radius
I would assume the pro are getting rid of detritus that has built up on your substrate, as well as cyno if you have.
Negative would be sucking up pods etc.

However IMO the good outweights the bad.
 
Joined
7 May 2007
Posts
1,103
Reaction score
11
Location
Hillcrest
I siphon the front part of my tank only as that is the only place I can do ! I think it is better as you get rid of any detritus build up.
 
Joined
7 May 2007
Posts
485
Reaction score
4
Location
Capital of India
If you are not running a DSB in your display, then i believe that siphoning of the substrate is crucial in the elimination of nitrates.

I believe that there will not be too many pods in your display substrate, they would more than likely be hiding in your live rock in the dark. Your fish would grazed any pods creeping around your substrate.

Using one of the gravel cleaners that you can find at the LFS (the one with the long tube) is ideal for syphoning. Because you can plunge it into the gravel to get all the crap deep in the substrate, you eliminate dead spots in the substrate that could be harbouring toxic gasses.
 

Alan

Admin
Joined
4 May 2007
Posts
5,974
Reaction score
124
Location
KZN
Personally i would not syphon a DSB and disturb the deeper layers of sand. It would be fine to syphon the shallow sand beds and only the top of a DSB.
 

Kanga

Retired Moderator
Joined
7 May 2007
Posts
4,576
Reaction score
23
Location
In the Koeberg blast radius
Personally i would not syphon a DSB and disturb the deeper layers of sand. It would be fine to syphon the shallow sand beds and only the top of a DSB.
agreed I only siphon the substrate in my tank by holding the cleanr 2 cm or so above to take the shit of the top

I sure as hell dont wanna take the stuff I have been wanting to thrive out of my dsb
 
Joined
7 May 2007
Posts
485
Reaction score
4
Location
Capital of India
If you syphon your DSB, you negate even having one.
 

Alan

Admin
Joined
4 May 2007
Posts
5,974
Reaction score
124
Location
KZN
I do the same, have a thin sand bed in the tank and a DSB in the sump and have never syphoned either.
 
Joined
12 May 2007
Posts
642
Reaction score
7
Location
Edenvale, Johannesburg
I used to siphon the top 4-5 cm of my DSB where I could reach and experienced no negatives from doing this. The waste wtaer coming off thsi was soemtiems choclolate brown - thsi in atank that was fed EXTREMELY lightly, and with a lowish fish bioload.

But my DSB was in the main display and only siphoned maybe 25% of it at any time (could not reach the rest), so it's size was more than capable of picking up any slack from any portion of the DSB that was damaged by the siphoning.

On a smaller DSB (relative to tank water volume, I would perhaps be a bit more cautious. Since I removed my DSB from the main display and moved it to my sump (now about 20% size of my original, I have not siphoned it at all, but I do try siphon all the gunk form my bare bottom main display now.

I do think it is important to remove as much detritus as possible, whether or not that detritus is in a DSB or SSB. The thing to note is not to disturb the DSB too much if at all possible (try do the surface only), failing that only do a portion of the DSB at a time to allow critters etc. time to migrate to newly cleaned areas, before tackling another area.

Clinton
 

Top