Okay reading the above where bacteria forms an important part of the corals diet could one assume then that a fairly high fish load would be beneficial for the corals?
It stands to reason that more fish=more bacteria in the system. The reason i ask this is we in SA have followed the theory for a long time of nutrient deficient systems with minimum fish on starvation diets.
Welcome to MASA Mantisfreak, gr8 to have you on board.
I really have to think hard how to describe this. You've likely seen where all of the SPS corals turn brown. Well, plain and simple, that would be too many nutrients in the system. The zoox (combined) would look brown so too many nutrients would cause a zoox population explosion. Do you have colorful SPS that are lightening in color? You are starving your corals....plain and simple.
I feed heavy and then I skim heavy. That is my preference. There's other ways to do this, that's just my preference.
Hmmm... where did you read this?
[Exactly]Low-nutrient is NOT the same as low-food. Like Curt is saying, low-nutrient just means the food is "taken out" before it starts degrading into "nutrients."
I didn't read this anywhere. Let me rephrase my comments. From PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, I have found this to be the case and PERSONAL EXPERIENCE has shown that this problem is easily remedied. Start feeding more and the colors become more vibrant again.
Sara....ya gotta be nice to me today. :razz: 20 minutes ago I just got home from a 25 hour workday where I acclimated over 500 fish that arrived late last night. My back is killing me, my feet are killing me, and I have a headache of unimaginable proportions. I'm pooped!!!
Please clarify lightening. Are you referring to lightening from eg. rust brown to rose pink in the case of acropora millepora or paling of an already pink acropora millepora?Do you have colorful SPS that are lightening in color?
If lightening in colour means expulsion/ingestion of zooxanthellae by the host to the point where colour reflected by the chromophores is the predominant colour, i have to disagree. YES, you are starving your corals of food produced by zooxanthellae, ie junk food/quick fix sugar! BUT you have to remember that the population of zooxanthellae is not only controlled by nutrient conditions.You are starving your corals....plain and simple.
And those that are not are converted to biomass, ie bacterioplancton and zooplancton, corals favorite source of nutrition! (a big part of me starting this thread.Yes....most SPS live in oligotrophic conditions. Yet, they also live in the most productive ecosystems in world. How on earth can the most productive ecosystem in the world be oligotrophic (nutrient deficient)? It's actually quite simple....the excess nutrients get swept out to the abyss.
Hmm... well, I DO AGREE that corals are largely underfed in aquariums and god only knows what myriad of ailments this is directly or indirectly responsible. I don't want to speculate about the "science" between feeding and zooxanthellate, but your guess is as good as mine.
You're one hour ahead of me but, yes, it was very late.I bet! Weren't you going to the airport at like 2am?!? :029:
The detrital mulm that comes off the rock is not really the food source. It's the bacterial floc that is attached to this detritus that benefits the corals IMO.I have read that this detritus (if it can get into the water-column) could also act as food for the corals? Is this true?
I agree completely.The actual host also has quite a bit of say in the matter: I suspect that reduction of zooxanthellae by the host is in response to it making more efficient use of zooxanthellae, as well as requiring less zooxanthellae to meat its carbon demand. Possibly (probably) because of the availability of another food source. Something like bacterioplancton.
The paling of an already pink milli.Please clarify lightening. Are you referring to lightening from eg. rust brown to rose pink in the case of acropora millepora or paling of an already pink acropora millepora?
I agree again. One time I had a drawing of how very tightly cycled that nutrients are on a reef. The efficiency of a healthy coral reef is nothing short of amazing.And those that are not are converted to biomass, ie bacterioplancton and zooplancton, corals favorite source of nutrition! (a big part of me starting this thread.
When I had my SPS prop tank running, I did both wet and dry skimming at the same time for the advantages of each type of skimming.so do we skim wet or dry with with a high fish and coral bioload?
ok,my tank is 90% SPS.the reason why i skim wet at times it to help remove phosphates.whats yur theroy Mantis?When I had my SPS prop tank running, I did both wet and dry skimming at the same time for the advantages of each type of skimming.
I'm not sure it matters... have I showed you guys this yet?
http://www.asira.org/proteinskimmers