Harbour pollution sparks fears for species

Discussion in 'Diving, Collecting and Environmental Discussions' started by gaboon, 28 Dec 2007.

  1. gaboon

    gaboon

    Joined:
    14 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    2,241
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Northriding
    December 28 2007 at 11:29AM
    By Matthew Savides

    Pollution in Durban harbour, which killed hundreds of fish on Wednesday, has spread over several square kilometres, heightening fears that more fish, animals and their habitats could be affected.

    The strong, sulphur-like smell that has blanketed the area since Wednesday morning was still noticeable on Thursday.

    Lin Gravelet-Blondin, Deputy Director of Water Quality Management in the Water Affairs department, said on Wednesday that only 10 fish had died, but he admitted on Thursday that the situation was "much worse than initially thought".

    During a visit to the affected area, near the Bluff Yacht Club, he said "hundreds" of fish had died or were dying.




    Evidence suggested that the toxin was hydrogen sulphide, which is toxic to humans and animals.

    Gravelet-Blondin said there was an "unnatural" amount of organic waste in the water that could have begun reacting chemically because of the heat and direct sunlight hitting the water in the past few days.

    The results of tests done on Thursday, which could confirm the theory, were expected in the next few days. "It is not natural to have this amount of organic waste in the water," said Gravelet-Blondin.

    It appeared that the death of hundreds of fish close to the yacht club on Monday was linked to the latest incident. A link to the death of thousands of fish at Wilson's Wharf on Friday was also being investigated.

    Mercury readers reacted angrily to the story published on Thursday, with most calling for action against the individual or company responsible for the pollution, or the dumping of the organic waste which caused it.

    Speaking on Wednesday, eThekwini Municipal Manager Michael Sutcliffe said the first deaths recorded at Wilson's Wharf were not due to toxins, but rather natural substances that were in the water. He said there were several possibilities being probed, but would not say what these were until reports were handed to him.

    Environmental affairs department spokesperson Mbulelo Baloyi said the department would only get involved if asked to do so. He said the Water affairs department, National Ports Authority and eThekwini officials were handling the investigation.
     
  2. AdS Guest




    to hide all adverts.
  3. leslie hempel

    leslie hempel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    7 May 2007
    Posts:
    14,530
    Likes Received:
    280
    Location:
    Gonubie East London
    sad, i wonder if it will ever be the same.
     
  4. DragonReef

    DragonReef

    Joined:
    4 May 2007
    Posts:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Durban, ZA
    eThekwini Municipal Manager Michael Sutcliffe

    He's more interested in changing street names when clearly there is something diabolically wrong in the harbour. I wonder how hard they are trying to get to the bottom of the problem.

    The water pickup for Ushaka Marine World is pretty close to the harbour mouth :(
     
  5. Mekaeel

    Mekaeel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    8 May 2007
    Posts:
    24,229
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Point Waterfront Durban
    this is bad.wonder how its gonna effect Vetchies with the South blowing and maybe even spread towards umhlanga and surrounding areas.maybe Kevin can give us some input on this
     
  6. KevinW

    KevinW

    Joined:
    6 May 2007
    Posts:
    342
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Hillcrest
    I can (but cannot be quoted .......) Essentially what has happened is that there was an incident on Thursday evening or early Friday where something caused the oxygen levels in the Wilson's Wharf basin to plummet (measurements that I took showed that there was actually no oxygen at all in the water inside the basin). From the measurements that I took it would seem that the source of the problem was something that came down the stormwater canal that drains into the harbour immediately to the south of the Wilsons Wharf basin. The latest incident was caused by something that came down the Amanzimyama Canal which drains into the harbour up at Bayhead. Both incidents resulted in a significant fish kills and also affected a number of other species (sand prawns, crabs, polycheates etc). The harbour will recover to what it was before the incidents, probably quite slowly though. The CSIR and Metro are investigating to try to determine the source of the pollution but I don't hold out much hope as it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to try to trace the source of the pollution. Both incidents have probably been caused by some small business flushing something down the stormwater drains.
     
  7. Mekaeel

    Mekaeel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    8 May 2007
    Posts:
    24,229
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Point Waterfront Durban
    ok a bit off topic here.im gonna be fishing in the harbour tomorrow evening.is it really worth going and fishing?and should there be any fish caught,will those fish be poisoned?eadible?
     
  8. KevinW

    KevinW

    Joined:
    6 May 2007
    Posts:
    342
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Hillcrest
    Would not bother fishing in the port at present.....
     
  9. lIghty

    lIghty

    Joined:
    3 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    5,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Location:
    Westville, Durban
    if I was you, i'd rather go to CTFM to eat?
     
  10. lIghty

    lIghty

    Joined:
    3 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    5,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Location:
    Westville, Durban
    so I guess collecting water from north beach is out, kevin do you think that umdloti would be ok?
     
  11. gaz19

    gaz19

    Joined:
    10 Jun 2007
    Posts:
    1,783
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    durban,kloof
    it should be, the water cant spred that fast
     
  12. Mekaeel

    Mekaeel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    8 May 2007
    Posts:
    24,229
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Point Waterfront Durban
    ok im not using seawater,untill this mess gets cleaned up
     
  13. Mekaeel

    Mekaeel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    8 May 2007
    Posts:
    24,229
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Point Waterfront Durban
    :lol: its more for the sport rather then the chow
     
  14. KevinW

    KevinW

    Joined:
    6 May 2007
    Posts:
    342
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Hillcrest
    The pollution is contained within the harbour. My reading show that the water is back to normal by the time it leaves the entrance channel. Collecting water outside of the port should be OK
     
  15. Mekaeel

    Mekaeel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    8 May 2007
    Posts:
    24,229
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Point Waterfront Durban
    excellent news.thank you Kevin!
     
  16. lIghty

    lIghty

    Joined:
    3 Nov 2007
    Posts:
    5,053
    Likes Received:
    52
    Location:
    Westville, Durban
    Thanks kevin, a supid question of the topic, but when collecting fresh water can "white spot" be transferred to a tank?
     
  17. KevinW

    KevinW

    Joined:
    6 May 2007
    Posts:
    342
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Hillcrest
    My guess would be yes it is possible but I would get confirmation from the guru's on this
     
  18. Mekaeel

    Mekaeel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    8 May 2007
    Posts:
    24,229
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Point Waterfront Durban
    yes it can.always try and get the water temperature up to the same temp as your tank water,this will help in reducing the risk of whitespots.fish are sensative to sudden temperature changes.also try and use the water up in less than 2 hours after collecting.
    oh by the way im no Guru
     
  19. Warr7207

    Warr7207

    Joined:
    28 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    12,781
    Likes Received:
    31
    Location:
    JHB
    I am reading a marine book where they suggest sea water should be stored in darkness for 2-3 weeks then filter off the dead plankton etc. Apparently this stops any nasty organisms or disease being introduce into the reef system but doesn't change the chemical elements of the sea water.
     
  20. Mekaeel

    Mekaeel Moderator MASA Contributor

    Joined:
    8 May 2007
    Posts:
    24,229
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Point Waterfront Durban
    yes thats true,but if the water is used up in 1-2 hours,theres chances of little/no die off.you putting in fresh plankton.when storing water i agree on your post.also when using that water up,dont use the last 5cm of water left as this is where all the die off sits
     
  21. Warr7207

    Warr7207

    Joined:
    28 Dec 2007
    Posts:
    12,781
    Likes Received:
    31
    Location:
    JHB
    So if I ship up some Indian Ocean to Joburg, I should go with what the book says.
     
Recent Posts

Loading...
Similar Threads - Harbour pollution sparks Forum Date
Wreck off Durban harbour Diving, Collecting and Environmental Discussions 12 Jul 2010
News24: 120 dead fish in Durban harbour Diving, Collecting and Environmental Discussions 21 Sep 2007
pollution on the natal coast General Discussions and Advice 26 Jul 2010