RSS Blastomussa loyae resurrected as a valid species from the Red Sea

MASA Admin

Moderator
Joined
8 May 2007
Posts
14,097
Reaction score
218
blastomussa-loyae.jpg
Blastomussa loyae from the Red Sea, photo by Charles Veron


Blastomussa loyae was first described from the Red Sea in 1978 as a separate species from Blastomussa merleti*due to the separated walls and ‘irregular voids’ in the corallites of colonies. Blastomussa loyae*was first discovered growing in abundance alongside B. merleti*but although the species was first accepted as distinct, Stephen Cairns and Charles Veron subsequently classified B. loyae*as a Red Sea variant. New analysis of Red Sea Blastomussa loyae*skeletons by Karl Kleemann and Christian Baal of the University of Vienna is making the case for*B. loyae as a valid species again.*

Blastomussa-loyae-skeleton-300x221.png
A close up of the skeleton used to make the case for Blastomussa loyae shows the irregular voids in the colony


The authors of the new paper published in the Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom*state that “the observed features in B. loyae*specimens as specified and figured [in the paper], and the*co-occurrence with true B. merleti on the same knoll warrant the species’ re-establishment”. These couple images from Veron’s Corals of the World show photographs of Red Sea Blastomussa*with living polyps that resemble the skeletons and descriptions of Blastomussa loyae. But what do we know about coral taxonomy, Matthew Tibbits probably has some Blastomussa loyae*skeletons sitting on his desk waiting analysis of their microstructure to tell us it’s actually related to Caulastrea.


Blastomussa-loyae.jpg
Another image of a probable Blastomussa loyae photographed in the Red Sea by Charles Veron



Readers also viewed:






e70p1mfDdWk


More...
 
Back
Top Bottom